For example, in filartiga v penairala, a case concerning a claim for damages for alleged torture of a. Pena irala, wherein us courts were allowed to try human rights violations committed abroad even when both the torturer and the victim were foreigners or in legalese, without any jurisdictional link to the forum. Pena irala, 6 which reimagined the ats as a basis for federal courts to address human rights abuses occurring. It thus extends the jurisdiction of united states courts to tortious acts committed around the world. As with many landmark decisions, the importance of the opinion in the filartiga v. Filartigas legacy in an era of military privatization by.
The us can be bound by customary international law internationally, but the effect of cil in the us courts and in relationship to us federal law is uncertain. Pena irala, which paved the way for a new conceptualization of the ats. Posts about filartiga v penalrala written by africlaw. A suit claiming that penairala d had tortured filartigas p decedent to death while he was a police insp. That is because the criminal courts of many nations combine civil and criminal proceedings. Pena lrala2 has helped to set united states judicial policy on a course of reform. For purpose of the allen tort statute, torture may be considered to violate law of nations. The court of appeals was able to extend its jurisdiction under the alien tort claims acts of 1789, the 1980 decision of the second circuit in filartiga v. The growing importance of customary international human.
Penairala that the atca could be used to sue a paraguayan police officer for acts of torture that he had committed in paraguay. The center for justice and accountability cja is a us nonprofit international human rights organization based in san francisco, california. Torture as tort available for download and read online in other formats. Penairala dean rusk the decision of the second circuit court of appeals in the filartiga case probably will not stand as a landmark case with farreaching implications for the development of international law. Joel filartiga, a physician, describes himself as a longstanding opponent of the government of president alfredo stroessner, which has held power in paraguay since 1954. The complaint alleged torture of the plaintiffs brother see below leading to his death.
Pena irala opened the door for the use of the ats for aliens to assert jurisdiction in federal court for human rights violations and other. View homework help filartiga case brief from posc 4470 at clemson university. Assuming the filartigas ultimately were able to obtain a. The filartigas brought this action in the eastern district of new york against americo norberto penairala pena, also a citizen of paraguay, for wrongfully causing the death of dr. Joel filartiga s, a paraguayan doctor, sons custodial death due to torture in police custody. Federal jurisdiction over international human rights claims. The court of appeals held that deliberate torture perpetrated under color of official authority violates universally accepted norms of the international law of human rights, regardless of the nationality of the parties, and that 28 u. But what is the legacy of this case in an era of military privatization. This will assist inquiries into its judicial jurisdiction and choice of law, and it will make filartiga type cases more understandable and therefore more. Fanny irala ac 19874 landau, mihalakos and freedman, js. Pdf torture as tort download full pdf book download.
Filartiga v pena irala pdf free download as pdf file. Pena irala is the paradigm for studying private torture claims against foreign officials in the united states. Argued september 14, 2001officially released march 5, 2002 james a. However, cil has been prominently used in the human rights arena and has been interpreted by us courts. For a sister, court fight stirs memories of paraguay. Pena irala established the idea that domestic tort suits might be brought under the alien tort claims act atca against those accused of violating human rights norms. The first case brought under the ats for human rights abuses was filartiga v. On appeal from the court of common pleas of clark county. Pena irala1 held that a deliberate act of torture committed in paraguay by a paraguayan official against a paraguayan citizen violated the international law of human rights.
As the paradigm, the filartiga action must be succinctly defined. Supreme court has granted certiorari in the alien tort statute ats 1 case of kiobel v. Shifting the lens on alien tort statute litigation. It set the precedent for united states federal courts to punish nonamerican citizens for tortious acts committed outside the united states that were in violation of public international law or any treaties to which the united states is a party. Federal jurisdiction of alleged torturer under the alien tort. A suit claiming that pena irala d had tortured filartiga s p decedent to death while he was a police inspector general, was brought by. The landmark case pioneered the human rights application of a previously littleused 1789 federal statute, the alien. It has made clear that abusers of internationally defined human rights from other countries who find themselves in the united states can be. The wellestablished universal prohibition of torture under international law, the court held, must be honoured in u. Pena irala which recognized jurisdiction under atca and held that torture comes under the umbrella of the law of nations, andthe torture victim protection act, which codified the filartiga. Professor william aceves engaging new volume the anatomy of torture. Civil liability of corporate and nonstate aiders and abettors of international terrorism as an evolving notion under international law. Penairala, involved a paraguayan family that successfully used the. Joel filartigas, a paraguayan doctor, sons custodial death due to torture in police custody.
Are there available legal responses to what we might call the privatization of torture. Pena irala is related with the death of seventeen year old boy under due to the torturer of the police under custody. Filartiga case brief filartiga v penairala1980 1 court a. A new name will once again combine interstate law with the common law of. Beyond the alien tort claims act northwestern pritzker school of.
District court for the eastern district of new york, filartiga v. It set the precedent for united states federal courts to punish nonamerican citizens for tortious acts committed outside the united states that were in violation of public international law the law of nations or any treaties to which the united states is a party. The suit was brought by an alien residing in the united states against a former official of paraguay then visiting the united states. Pena irala,2 the united states, pursuant to a request by the u. Dolly filartiga has never forgotten the words barked at her early one morning 28 years ago.
Shifting the lens on alien tort statute litigation 149 the complex relationship of the stroessner and marcos regimes with the usa. Federal jurisdiction, human rights, and the law of nations. Get free access to the complete judgment in filartiga v. The government of paraguay, because of his efforts to help poor and. His daughter, dolly filartiga, arrived in the united states in 1978 under a visitors visa, and has since applied for permanent political asylum. Penairala, the first successful case to invoke the statute, opened the. Universal civil jurisdiction under international law ejil. International law as the rule of decision richard a. Eichman v attorney general of israel, supreme court decision case concerning the temple of preah vihear certain expenses of the united nations article 17, paragraph 2, of the charter.
Unlike traditional casebooks, this book emphasizes the. Founded in 1998, cja represents survivors of torture and other grave human rights abuses in cases against individual rights violators before u. Enforcement of international human rights in the federal. The landmark case pioneered the human rights application of a previously littleused 1789 federal statute, the alien tort claims act, which gives foreign nationals the right to sue for wrongful actions that violate international law. Filartiga held that a paraguayan police inspector who had come to the united states could be sued under the ats for torture he committed in paraguay. Joel filartiga and dolly filartiga charging former paraguayan official americo penairala with the wrongful death of joelito filartiga. At the same time, the court also granted certiorari in mohamad v. Federal jurisdiction of alleged torturer under the alien tort statute filartiga v. Springfield, clark county prosecutors office office of the. Supreme court has granted certiorari in the alien tort statute.
To the contrary, this article exposes how filartiga and marcos recast as entirely foreign vio lence in which the us executive was deeply involved. A suit claiming that pena irala d had tortured filartiga s p decedent to death while he was a police insp. In 1976, the father of a young man who had been tortured and killed in paraguay while in police custody witnessed one of his sons torturers walking the streets of manhattan. Court of appeals for the second circuit at the end of oral argument, submitted an important amicus curiae brief further explaining its views on the customary international law of human rights. Filartiga and joel filartiga, plaintiffsappellants, v. Filartiga, arrived in the united states in 1978 under a visitors visa, and has since applied for permanent political asylum. A suit against penairala d on the premise that he had tortured to death the decedent of filartiga p, was filed by filartiga p. Pena irala, one of the most significant examples of human rights litigation in the u. The decision in filartiga led to a dramatic rise in. Rise and fall of universal civil jurisdiction project muse johns. Pdf civil liability of corporate and nonstate aiders and. In 1980, however, the second circuitthe first court of appeals to expound on section 50held that a damages action could be brought under section 50 by paraguayan citizens against a paraguayan official for the alleged torture and killing of a family member in paraguay. The ats remained dormant nearly for two centuries until it spectacularly entered the stage before 2nd us circuit court of appeal in a filartiga v penairala wherein paraguay citizens were allowed to sue a former paraguayan police officer allegedly involved in an extrajudicial killing of a paraguayan dissidents son in paraguay. Pena irala1 case has little to do with the parties involved.
United states court of appeals for the second circuit 630 f. It is more likely to find its place as a legal oddity picked up in but see. In that case, 9,500 human rights victims filed suit against the marcos estate, citing a leading 1980 american case, filartiga v. The supreme court seems to have settled on the last term, as does this article. Pena irala the united states court of appeals for the second circuit in filartiga v. Pena irala the facts of the case this case is related with dr. The meaning and scope of the law of nations in the. Troutman sanders and pepper hamilton have agreed to merge effective april 1, 2020. Court of appeals for the second circuit decided filartiga v. In the supreme court of ohio state of ohio, appellee, case no. The filartigas brought this action in the eastern district of new york against americo norberto pena irala pena, also a citizen of. Alien tort claims act united states 1789 britannica. The filartigas brought this action in the eastern district of new york against americo norberto pena irala 4 pena, also a citizen of paraguay, for wrongfully causing the death of dr.
829 1003 335 1187 548 240 1213 643 500 1234 484 1297 539 750 1422 1057 40 287 235 1024 318 1336 382 709 1366 542 54 108 943 925 554 405 1320 789 906 752 1498 1069 742 1477 884 930 480